Comparative Analysis

Comparative Analysis

Penumbra • Aztec • Elusiv • Anoma • Nightfall


As the landscape of zero-knowledge-based privacy systems matures, various projects have emerged with different architectures and tradeoffs around encrypted transactions, intent resolution, and shielded execution. This section compares SnarkSide with several notable cryptographic protocols, focusing on design philosophy, scope of privacy, settlement models, and scalability.

The goal is to illustrate how SnarkSide differentiates itself not just through ZK integration, but through its holistic, intent-driven architecture for perpetual futures trading under full cryptographic anonymity.


Comparison Table

Feature

SnarkSide

Penumbra

Aztec (Aztec3)

Elusiv

Anoma

Nightfall

Domain

Perpetuals DEX

Private DEX / PoS staking

General L2 w/ Privacy

Token Mixer + Messaging

Multi-asset intent protocol

Private Enterprise Rollup

Execution Type

Off-chain MPC match

On-chain batch auction

Private L2 VM

Off-chain + zkMixer

Full intent gossip layer

L2 zkRollup on Ethereum

ZK System

Groth16 / Circom

zk-SNARKs (Groth16)

Noir / Plonk

ZK-Mixer (ElGamal)

zkBARL / PLONK / FHE

zk-SNARKs

User Trade Visibility

Fully Encrypted

Encrypted Batch Intent

Private Functions

Ephemeral mixers

Encrypted intent gossip

Masked ERCs only

Vault Architecture

UTXO w/ Nullifiers

Shielded Transfers

State VM + Notes

Account-based

Multi-layer note system

UTXO model

Settlement Model

Delayed batch settlement

Epoch finality

Local exec + batch settle

User-side

Partial rollup

Finality per ERC operation

MEV Resistance

Intent-based w/ ZK match

Auction anti-MEV design

Partially mitigated

None (wallet-layer only)

Intent obfuscation layer

Central relayer

Privacy Scope

Trading + Vaults + LP

Trades + Delegation

Contract calls

Transfer only

Full-stack coordination

Enterprise only

FHE Integration

Experimental

No

No

No

Active (zkFHE)

No

Application Target

DeFi Futures

Cosmos Ecosystem

Ethereum Ecosystem

Solana Wallet Layer

New stack / Sovereign L1

ConsenSys Enterprises


Project Summaries & Distinctions


Penumbra

What it is: A Cosmos-based shielded DEX using batch auctions and zk-SNARK-based private transactions.

Key Features:

  • Epoch-based encrypted trading

  • Delegation staking with shielded rewards

  • Shielded notes system with transparent validator rotation

SnarkSide Difference:

  • Penumbra targets Cosmos token swaps; SnarkSide focuses exclusively on intent-based perpetual derivatives

  • SnarkSide uses off-chain MPC matchers and zk-intent layers instead of auction matching

  • Penumbra relies on time-based epoch clearing, while SnarkSide supports continuous, non-epoch intent execution


Aztec (Aztec3 / Noir)

What it is: A private Ethereum L2 using a custom zkVM to support shielded smart contracts.

Key Features:

  • Private DeFi primitives (e.g. shielded lending)

  • Noir language for writing private programs

  • Encrypted transaction graph over account model

SnarkSide Difference:

  • Aztec is general-purpose and VM-focused; SnarkSide is purpose-built for futures privacy under MEV-hostile conditions

  • SnarkSide doesn’t use private smart contracts, but intent/matching/vault circuits

  • Aztec uses a Plonkish stack; SnarkSide optimized for Groth16 batch-verifiability on L2s


Elusiv

What it is: A Solana-based privacy layer focusing on wallet-to-wallet transfers and ephemeral messaging.

Key Features:

  • zkMixer for SOL and SPL tokens

  • Encrypted chat with key derivation from wallet entropy

  • Web extension wallet integration

SnarkSide Difference:

  • Elusiv is not a trading platform, only a transfer/mixer layer

  • SnarkSide provides vault state, position, liquidation, and LP privacy—not just payment anonymity

  • Elusiv lacks intent architecture or vault state transitions


Anoma

What it is: A sovereign L1 protocol centered around intent-based execution and multi-asset coordination.

Key Features:

  • Intent gossip layer

  • Partially homomorphic obfuscation

  • Coordination across heterogeneous assets

SnarkSide Difference:

  • Philosophically closest to SnarkSide in terms of intent logic, but SnarkSide is strictly focused on ZK-based perps with working UTXO state today

  • Anoma is still in pre-mainnet development, with deep focus on cryptographic consensus and gossip

  • SnarkSide executes intents today on off-chain MPC layers with ZK settlement; it is not waiting for L1 consensus protocols to mature


Nightfall

What it is: An enterprise-focused privacy L2 developed by ConsenSys, designed for shielded ERC-20 and NFT operations.

Key Features:

  • zkUTXO-based asset masking

  • Internal batch prover for ERC standard ops

  • Tailored to supply chain and compliance use cases

SnarkSide Difference:

  • Nightfall does not support DeFi, perpetuals, or any form of user-driven execution matching

  • It is not designed for anonymous trading or LP interaction

  • SnarkSide is retail-focused, chain-agnostic, and structurally hostile to any form of centralized relayer logic


Conclusion

SnarkSide is not simply a private transfer system or a zk-enabled L2. It is a purpose-built, zero-knowledge perpetual futures exchange, designed from first principles around:

  • Fully encrypted intents

  • Off-chain MPC coordination

  • Nullifier-protected vaults

  • Non-interactive liquidation

  • Institutional-grade dark pool privacy

While other systems push general-purpose privacy or transfer anonymity, SnarkSide operates where transparency is most weaponized: leverage, liquidation, and market positioning.

In this sense, SnarkSide is not just in conversation with these systems. It exists where they end—and where adversarial market structure begins.

Last updated